Local visibility study · data release v1.2

Who shows up on Google Maps, and what might be worth checking in yours

We looked at 1,571 owner-operated local businesses across 9 small-business categories and 6 U.S. metros. Seven questions came out of it, each one something an owner could look at in their own setup.

High
72%

of businesses in the Maps top 20 show up at only one search point across their metro.

Medium
5

reviews: how far the typical business ranked 11–20 sits below its market's rank 4–10 median.

Medium
81%

of listings with no reviews never appear in a top 20.

High
47%

chance a top-3 business out-rated a not-seen rival on stars: a coin flip.

So what 1

Do you have as many reviews as the businesses just ahead of you, and are customers being asked?

Review count is the attribute most tied to tier, even with distance held equal. We cannot show that gaining reviews moves rank, only that the two go together. Star rating, by contrast, barely separates leaders.

07HighGBP-D5-01

Median reviews climb from 3 for unseen businesses to 31 for the top 3: the strongest association in the study

Review count by tier, all categories, one review source for every tier.

Review count goes with visibility: within a market, businesses with more reviews sit in higher tiers, the strongest association in the study.

CaveatAssociation in one snapshot; order of cause unknown.

Glossaryreview count

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

08MediumGBP-D1-04

What a top-3 business looks like depends on its category: 52 reviews for house cleaners, 6 for handymen

Median reviews of owner-operated top-3 businesses, by category. Hatched rows are low-confidence and stay explorer-only.

Owner-operated house cleaners in the top 3 have a median 51.5 reviews.

CaveatTwo metros pooled; n per category is small.

Glossaryreview count

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-D1-01 (Low) · also GBP-D1-02 (Low) · also GBP-D1-03 (Low)

09MediumGBP-D1-04

The review ladder is steep in most categories; for handymen it is nearly flat

Median reviews by category and tier. Color is scaled within each row so the shape of each ladder shows.

Owner-operated house cleaners in the top 3 have a median 51.5 reviews.

CaveatTwo metros pooled; n per category is small.

Glossaryreview count

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-D1-09 (Medium)

10MediumGBP-D2-01

39% of businesses ranked 11–20 already have as many reviews as the typical rank 4–10 business in their market

Shares of businesses already at the next tier's median review count. Whiskers are 95% intervals.

39% of businesses ranked 11-20 already have at least the median review count of businesses ranked 4-10 in their market.

CaveatTier is best rank across 8 distant points.

Glossaryreview count

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-D2-02 (Medium) · also GBP-D2-03 (Medium) · also GBP-D2-04 (Medium)

11MediumGBP-E3-01

81% of listings with zero reviews never appear in a top 20

Share of listings with no reviews at all, by tier. Ghost listings pile up in the unseen tier.

Listings with no reviews ("ghost listings") are mostly invisible: 81% of them never appear in the top 20 at any of eight points.

CaveatRule-based segment; snapshot.

Glossaryreview count

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

12MediumGBP-D6-02

Where competition is thin, 55% of top-3 spots go to businesses with under 10 reviews, against 22% where it is crowded

Share of owner-operated top-3 appearances with fewer than 10 reviews, by how crowded the search point is.

Low-review top-3 holders concentrate where competition is thin: 55% of top-3 appearances at thin points have <10 reviews vs 22% at full points.

CaveatThin points concentrate in home health and handyman.

Glossaryreview count, local pack

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

15HighGBP-D4-01

A top-3 business out-rated a not-seen rival only 47% of the time: a coin flip

Within-market AUC of star rating, top 3 vs not seen. 0.50 means no separation. The band is the 95% interval.

Star rating does not separate top-3 businesses from not-seen ones in the same market: within-market AUC 0.47, near a coin flip.

CaveatRatings cluster at 4.8-5.0 in every tier.

Glossarystar rating

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

28MediumGBP-D3-01

Where would your review count place you among the leaders in your category?

Percentile among top-3 and top-10 owner-operators, pooled across metros. Confidence varies by category (see chart 08).

—

percentile among top 3 accountants

—

percentile among ranks 4–10 accountants

Comparing reviews with the category benchmark tracks tier slightly better than comparing with the nearest point's top 3 (AUC 0.73 vs 0.71).

CaveatNearest search point can be ~9 km from the business.

Glossaryreview count, local pack

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

What datanephew could look at in yours

  • Your review count and how fast it has been growing
  • Who ranks above you for your category near your address, and how many reviews they have

How many reviews do I have compared with the businesses ranking above me for my category near my address, and how fast am I adding more?

So what 2

Which part of town do your customers search from, and do you show up there?

Most businesses appear in one patch of their metro, and rank tends to slip with distance. How fast it slips within a few kilometers is not known yet.

02MediumGBP-C2-02

Even in the top 3, 47% of businesses appear at just one search point; for ranks 11–20 it is 87%

Share of visible owner-operators seen at only one search point across their metro. Whiskers are 95% intervals.

Even top-3 businesses usually appear at only one or two points: 47% at one point, vs 87% of rank 11-20 businesses.

CaveatGrid geometry, not business strength.

Glossaryproximity, local pack

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-C2-01 (High)

04HighGBP-D5-02

The farther from the searcher, the likelier a business never shows: 48% unseen within 2 km, 97% past 8 km

Tier mix of listings by distance to the nearest search point, all categories.

Listings farther from the nearest search point sit in lower tiers, even at equal review standing (odds ratio 0.51 per 2 km).

CaveatDistance to search points, not to real customers.

Glossaryproximity

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

05MediumGBP-C1-01

At a single search point, 34% of results within 2 km rank in the top 3, against 17% at 2–4 km

Share of appearances ranked 1–3, by km from the search point.

At a given search point, businesses farther away tend to rank lower: rank worsens with distance at 74% of points.

CaveatDistance known for 38% of appearances, skewed to better ranks.

Glossaryproximity

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

06HighGBP-D5-02

Distance costs visibility in every category, not just a few

Share of listings never seen in a top 20, by category and distance. Dashed cells have a small sample (directional).

Listings farther from the nearest search point sit in lower tiers, even at equal review standing (odds ratio 0.51 per 2 km).

CaveatDistance to search points, not to real customers.

Glossaryproximity

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

What datanephew could look at in yours

  • Your rank from several points around your area, not just one
  • Where your website visitors actually come from

Where do my website visitors come from, and how do I rank for my category from a few different parts of town?

So what 3

Is your primary category the most specific one that is true?

Estate attorneys and handymen who use the exact category show up higher. Pooled across all nine categories the pattern is flat, so it may only apply in some.

22MediumGBP-E1-02

Estate attorneys using the exact primary category: 88% of the top 3, 31% of the unseen

Share of listings using the exact primary category, by tier.

Exact primary category among estate-planning listings falls by tier: 88% of top 3, 70% of 4-10, 46% of 11-20, 31% of not seen.

CaveatVisible tiers have 13-23 listings each.

Glossaryprimary category

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-E1-04 (Medium) · also GBP-E1-03 (Low)

So what 4

If someone read only your homepage text, could they tell which city you serve and where you are?

Almost every top-3 homepage names its metro's city or a street address somewhere in its visible text. The title tab is a weaker signal. These are associations, not effects, and the check does not record where on the page the mention sits.

24MediumGBP-G1-01

94% of top-3 homepages name the city or a street address in their text, against 69% of unseen ones

Where on the homepage the city or an address appears. "Page title" is the title in the browser tab. "Page text" is all the visible text on the homepage, including the header, menu, headings and footer: it counts the metro's main city name or anything shaped like a street address. A suburb's own name does not count. The meta description and schema markup were not checked, and the check does not record which part of the page the mention was in.

Homepages naming the city or a street address go with top-3 rather than not-seen status (94% vs 69%), also after reviews, claimed and distance.

CaveatCity match uses the metro name only.

GlossaryNAP consistency

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

So what 5

Does your listing's website link and phone number match what your homepage says?

Unseen businesses more often list a website that no longer loads, or a phone number that does not match. These look like housekeeping issues. Whether they cost calls is not known.

26MediumGBP-A3-02

11% of unseen businesses list a website that no longer resolves; for the top 3 it is 0%

What happened when we visited each listed website, by tier.

11% of not-seen businesses list a website whose domain no longer resolves, vs 0% of top-3 businesses.

CaveatSmall counts; one DNS check per site.

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

27MediumGBP-G5-02

Top-3 sites show a phone number 90% of the time; unseen sites 80%

Phone consistency checks, one dot per tier.

9% of homepages show a phone that differs from the listing and 17% show no phone (9% of top-3 vs 20% of not-seen).

CaveatMismatches may be tracking or second-location numbers.

GlossaryNAP consistency

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

So what 6

Is hiding your address worth being rarer near the top?

Service-area businesses are rarer at the top. It looks like a tradeoff worth understanding, not something to change for its own sake.

23MediumGBP-B3-01

Service-area businesses are 6% of the top 3 but 20% of ranks 11–20

Share of visible owner-operators that hide their address, by tier.

Service-area businesses are 6% of owner-operated top-3 businesses but 20% of those ranked 11-20.

CaveatMaps location of service-area businesses is a hidden centroid.

Glossaryservice-area business

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-B3-02 (Medium)

So what 7

What would your own numbers show?

This study is one snapshot. It cannot say whether more reviews come before higher rank, or whether homepage changes bring more calls. Only a business's own numbers over time can. That is the part datanephew can look at.

What changed in my searches, website visits and customer reviews over the last 90 days?

In the explorer, not the story (10 more charts)

These are accurate and graded, but nothing about them leads an owner to a next step on their own. They stay available for people exploring the data.

01MediumGBP-A1-01

We started with 1,848 visible businesses and ended with 263 homepages timed on a phone

Each bar is a stage of the study.

Of 1,848 businesses visible in the Maps top 20, 1,502 are owner-operated (v2 classes).

CaveatSnapshot of 18 category-metro pairs, 2026-10-18.

Glossarylocal pack

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

13MediumGBP-D6-01

In handyman markets 59% of top-3 spots go to sub-10-review businesses; in plumbing, 0%

Share of top-3 appearances with fewer than 10 reviews, by category.

28% of owner-operated top-3 appearances belong to businesses with fewer than 10 reviews.

CaveatConcentrated in home health and handyman.

Glossaryreview count

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

14MediumGBP-E3-02

Established local pros reach the top 3 19% of the time; ghost listings 3%

Tier mix for five rule-based owner profiles.

"Established local pros" (median 39 reviews, 29 photos, claimed, storefront) are top 3 19% of the time, vs 10% for claimed starters.

CaveatSegments are descriptive groupings, not causes.

Glossaryservice-area business

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-E3-04 (Low)

16MediumGBP-D4-04

Businesses with no star rating yet are unseen 81% of the time, more than any rated group

Tier mix by rating band, all categories.

Within a search point, results rated 4.0-4.4 rank slightly lower than 4.8-5.0 results with similar review standing.

CaveatSmall effect: about 7 percentile points of rank.

Glossarystar rating

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

17HighGBP-D5-03

Once reviews and distance are counted, photos, a claimed profile and a website add nothing; reviews and distance do

Odds multiplier of reaching a higher tier per standard deviation. 1 means no association.

Photo count shows no association with tier once reviews and distance are accounted for (odds ratio per SD 0.97).

CaveatRaw photo counts do rise with tier.

Glossaryphotos, proximity, claimed profile, star rating, review count

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-D5-02 (High) · also GBP-D5-04 (High) · also GBP-D5-05 (High) · also GBP-D5-06 (High) · also GBP-D5-08 (Medium)

18MediumGBP-E2-03

Top-3 listings carry a median 13 photos against 3 for unseen ones, but the gap vanishes once reviews are counted

Raw gaps by tier, then the adjusted association underneath.

Top-3 listings have a median 13 photos vs 3 for not-seen listings, a gap that disappears once reviews are controlled.

CaveatRaw medians; see GBP-D5-03 for the adjusted view.

Glossaryphotos, claimed profile

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-D5-03 (High) · also GBP-D5-05 (High) · also GBP-E2-02 (High)

19HighGBP-G3-01

Lab speed looks the same up and down the ranking: median 57 for the top 3, 63.5 for unseen sites

Lighthouse mobile score by tier, one run per homepage.

Lab PageSpeed scores show no association with map-pack tier once reviews, claimed status and distance are controlled (median 58 top tiers vs 62.5).

CaveatLab data: one mobile run per homepage; no real-visitor data.

Glossarypage speed

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-G3-02 (High) · also GBP-G3-03 (High)

20MediumGBP-G3-05

94% of small-business homepages fail lab Core Web Vitals, including 97% of top-3 sites

Share failing the lab rule, and share taking over 5 seconds to show anything, by tier.

94% of small-business homepages fail lab Core Web Vitals, including 97% of top-3 businesses' sites.

CaveatLab thresholds; TBT stands in for INP.

Glossarypage speed

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

21LowGBP-G3-11

Squarespace homepages were slowest: 62% took over 5 seconds to show anything

Share of homepages with first paint over 5 s, by website platform. Directional.

Squarespace homepages were slowest to first paint here: 62% took over 5 s vs 24% of all sites (directional).

CaveatDirectional; platform goes with owner type.

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

25MediumGBP-G1-09

No homepage check stays associated with rank once reviews, claim status and distance are counted

Raw share of sites with each feature, by tier, sorted by the raw top-3 vs not-seen gap. Raw gaps are not effects.

None of the 30 website checks stays associated with tier once reviews, claimed status and distance are controlled (smallest q 0.33).

CaveatHomepage-only checks; 270 rendered sites.

datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18

How to read this

These are associations from a single Google Maps snapshot. Nothing here shows that changing a listing changes its rank. Review counts appear only as quantiles of groups of ten or more businesses; no single business is named.

Confidence grades come from the findings registry: High findings pass every robustness check, Medium findings have a clear direction with one known caveat, and Low findings are shown only so nothing is hidden.

datanephew (2026). Google Business Profile local visibility study, data release v1.2 (snapshot 2026-10-18). https://datanephew.com/research/local-pack-study/

Methods and data