Who shows up on Google Maps, and what might be worth checking in yours
We looked at 1,571 owner-operated local businesses across 9 small-business categories and 6 U.S. metros. Seven questions came out of it, each one something an owner could look at in their own setup.
High
72%
of businesses in the Maps top 20 show up at only one search point across their metro.
Medium
5
reviews: how far the typical business ranked 11–20 sits below its market's rank 4–10 median.
Medium
81%
of listings with no reviews never appear in a top 20.
High
47%
chance a top-3 business out-rated a not-seen rival on stars: a coin flip.
So what 1
Do you have as many reviews as the businesses just ahead of you, and are customers being asked?
Review count is the attribute most tied to tier, even with distance held equal. We cannot show that gaining reviews moves rank, only that the two go together. Star rating, by contrast, barely separates leaders.
07HighGBP-D5-01
Median reviews climb from 3 for unseen businesses to 31 for the top 3: the strongest association in the study
Review count by tier, all categories, one review source for every tier.
Review count goes with visibility: within a market, businesses with more reviews sit in higher tiers, the strongest association in the study.
CaveatAssociation in one snapshot; order of cause unknown.
datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18
What datanephew could look at in yours
Your rank from several points around your area, not just one
Where your website visitors actually come from
Where do my website visitors come from, and how do I rank for my category from a few different parts of town?
So what 3
Is your primary category the most specific one that is true?
Estate attorneys and handymen who use the exact category show up higher. Pooled across all nine categories the pattern is flat, so it may only apply in some.
22MediumGBP-E1-02
Estate attorneys using the exact primary category: 88% of the top 3, 31% of the unseen
Share of listings using the exact primary category, by tier.
Exact primary category among estate-planning listings falls by tier: 88% of top 3, 70% of 4-10, 46% of 11-20, 31% of not seen.
datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-E1-04 (Medium) · also GBP-E1-03 (Low)
So what 4
If someone read only your homepage text, could they tell which city you serve and where you are?
Almost every top-3 homepage names its metro's city or a street address somewhere in its visible text. The title tab is a weaker signal. These are associations, not effects, and the check does not record where on the page the mention sits.
24MediumGBP-G1-01
94% of top-3 homepages name the city or a street address in their text, against 69% of unseen ones
Where on the homepage the city or an address appears. "Page title" is the title in the browser tab. "Page text" is all the visible text on the homepage, including the header, menu, headings and footer: it counts the metro's main city name or anything shaped like a street address. A suburb's own name does not count. The meta description and schema markup were not checked, and the check does not record which part of the page the mention was in.
Homepages naming the city or a street address go with top-3 rather than not-seen status (94% vs 69%), also after reviews, claimed and distance.
datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18
So what 5
Does your listing's website link and phone number match what your homepage says?
Unseen businesses more often list a website that no longer loads, or a phone number that does not match. These look like housekeeping issues. Whether they cost calls is not known.
26MediumGBP-A3-02
11% of unseen businesses list a website that no longer resolves; for the top 3 it is 0%
What happened when we visited each listed website, by tier.
11% of not-seen businesses list a website whose domain no longer resolves, vs 0% of top-3 businesses.
CaveatSmall counts; one DNS check per site.
datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18
27MediumGBP-G5-02
Top-3 sites show a phone number 90% of the time; unseen sites 80%
Phone consistency checks, one dot per tier.
9% of homepages show a phone that differs from the listing and 17% show no phone (9% of top-3 vs 20% of not-seen).
CaveatMismatches may be tracking or second-location numbers.
datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-B3-02 (Medium)
So what 7
What would your own numbers show?
This study is one snapshot. It cannot say whether more reviews come before higher rank, or whether homepage changes bring more calls. Only a business's own numbers over time can. That is the part datanephew can look at.
What changed in my searches, website visits and customer reviews over the last 90 days?
datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18 · also GBP-D5-02 (High) · also GBP-D5-04 (High) · also GBP-D5-05 (High) · also GBP-D5-06 (High) · also GBP-D5-08 (Medium)
18MediumGBP-E2-03
Top-3 listings carry a median 13 photos against 3 for unseen ones, but the gap vanishes once reviews are counted
Raw gaps by tier, then the adjusted association underneath.
Top-3 listings have a median 13 photos vs 3 for not-seen listings, a gap that disappears once reviews are controlled.
CaveatRaw medians; see GBP-D5-03 for the adjusted view.
datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18
21LowGBP-G3-11
Squarespace homepages were slowest: 62% took over 5 seconds to show anything
Share of homepages with first paint over 5 s, by website platform. Directional.
Squarespace homepages were slowest to first paint here: 62% took over 5 s vs 24% of all sites (directional).
CaveatDirectional; platform goes with owner type.
datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18
25MediumGBP-G1-09
No homepage check stays associated with rank once reviews, claim status and distance are counted
Raw share of sites with each feature, by tier, sorted by the raw top-3 vs not-seen gap. Raw gaps are not effects.
None of the 30 website checks stays associated with tier once reviews, claimed status and distance are controlled (smallest q 0.33).
CaveatHomepage-only checks; 270 rendered sites.
datanephew GBP study v1.2 · Maps snapshot 2026-10-18
How to read this
These are associations from a single Google Maps snapshot. Nothing here shows that changing a listing changes its rank. Review counts appear only as quantiles of groups of ten or more businesses; no single business is named.
Confidence grades come from the findings registry: High findings pass every robustness check, Medium findings have a clear direction with one known caveat, and Low findings are shown only so nothing is hidden.
datanephew (2026). Google Business Profile local visibility study, data release v1.2 (snapshot 2026-10-18). https://datanephew.com/research/local-pack-study/